Thursday, January 21, 2016

Biafra: Take Kanu to Prison - Judge Refuses DSS Request to Further Detain Kanu in Their Custody

A Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered the Department of State Services to immediately take Nnamdi Kanu to prisons and has rejected the DSS request to remand Kanu in their custody.
IPOB Leader, Nnamdi Kanu
 
A Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered that the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra and founder of Radio Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu should be removed from Department of State Security Custody and be taken to prison.
 
The judge, in ordering the remand of the accused persons in prison, overruled the request by the Director of Public Prosecutions, Mr. Mohammed Diri, for an order further remanding the accused persons in the custody of the DSS.
 
The DSS had requested that the court grant its wish by granting it more days to further detain Nnamdi Kanu in their custody. However, the court thought it out of order considering that Kanu had spend more than 3 months in their custody.
 
The order came as a relief to the defence team, led on Wednesday by Mr. Chuks Mouoma (SAN), who had complained that the accused persons had been denied access to their families and lawyers since their arrest by the DSS on October 14, 2015.
 
A Magistrate’s Court, in Wuse Zone 2, Abuja, had earlier granted bail to Kanu and also made similar order, directing the DSS to release Kanu to the prison authorities.
 
Also, Justice Adeniyi Ademola of the same Federal High Court in Abuja had, on December 17, 2015, granted an unconditional bail to Kanu from the DSS custody.
 
But rather than release the IPOB leader, the Federal Government filed the fresh six counts, including treasonable felony, against the three accused persons barely 24 hours after Justice Ademola made the latest order.
 
On December 23, 2015, when Kanu and the two co-accused persons were produced in court for arraignment, the IPOB leader refused to take his plea due to what he called his lack of confidence in the presiding judge, Justice Ahmed Mohammed.
 
The case was later reassigned to Justice Tsoho.
 
After the accused persons pleaded not guilty to the six counts on Wednesday, Diri urged the court to order that Kanu be further remanded in the DSS custody for ease of conveying him to court, considering the security risk involved in bringing him to court from a farther location like the Kuje Prison.
 
But Muouma opposed the request, insisting that the “issue of convenience”, raised by the prosecution, could not override the position of the law.
 
He said, “The DPP himself has said this morning that investigation into the case has been completed. So, why do you still have to keep him?. The complainant, the DSS, cannot be the judge in its own case. The federal prison is the appropriate neutral party to keep an accused person.

“Once a defendant has been charged and arraigned, the proper and constitutional place of custody for remand is the prison. That is the age-long procedure we are familiar with.”
 
The judge, in his ruling, dismissed the prosecution’s request and upheld the argument by the defence lawyer that the law only permitted that accused person, who had taken his plea, could only be remanded in prison.
 
The judge has fixed Monday, January 25, 2015, for the hearing of the bail application filed on behalf of the accused persons.